In
his report for OECD in 2007, David Wiley defined sustainability as ‘an open
educational resource project’s on-going ability to meet its goals’. Wiley
proposed three models of sustainability, which he labelled:
·
the MIT model (all courses
offered by MIT, a large organisation, with a high degree of control and high
cost per course offered)
·
the USU model (many courses
offered by USU, a medium sized organisation, with a small degree of control,
and a smaller cost than MIT)
·
the Rice model (many courses
offered anywhere, by a small organisation, at no cost and virtually no control)
Using these criteria, the four open education initiatives
compare as follows:-
Change
MOOC – uses the Rice model mainly, with lots of contributors and
no cost, but controlled by the instigators of the course (which is the MIT
model)
Coursera – appears
to use the USU model.
Jorum
–
uses mainly the Rice model, but it has a very large number of courses, giving
the feel of a large organisation. It
wasn’t obvious what degree of control there was.
OpenLearn –
is the MIT model, with a high degree of control, and all courses produced by
the OU
It’s not always easy to see which of Wiley’s models was
used, mainly because you can’t always see the authorship of the courses
straightaway. As a student of the
OpenLearn (and OU) set-up, it was easier to ‘find’ the ownership of these
courses, but to a non-student, the OpenLearn set-up would not have been
transparent.
Personal comment - not part of the Activity :-)
This is hard work now, as the course has finished, but I'd done most of the reading for the Activity, so reckoned I might as well carry on for as long as I could - but holidays, gardening, sailing, etc get in the way. I don't know how people who work full time manage to keep up, but maybe they don't do the holidays and other stuff. Or maybe they are more driven and dedicated!!
No comments:
Post a Comment