Activity 7
Technology
OERs are ideally suited to the
great versatility of the internet. But there are problems in the definition of
OERs.
Hylen and Schuller stated in 2007 that
it was now possible to offer a new definition of OER as “accumulated assets
that can be enjoyed without restricting the possibilities of others to
enjoy them.” To be “open” meant that
“the resources either provide non-discriminatory access to the
resource or can also be contributed to and shared by anyone.” But technologies are rapidly changing, and
this definition will need to be changed as internet technologies change.
There is also the problem
of where and how to find OERs? This can be broadly split into 2 categories: where are OER stored and
how can they be identified in a web search? There are a number of
repositories that only store open content, so a search of those sites will
always return openly licensed content. More
general search engines, e.g. Google, cannot readily identify open sources.
One key observation was that there was
a tension between the desire to provide rich digital learning materials, using complex
technologies, and the desire to make learning materials as widely available as
possible, which often demands simpler technologies.
Barriers
to Uptake
Barriers for using or producing OER
can be thought of as technical, economic, social, policy-oriented
and legal. A technical barrier would be the lack of
broadband availability. The lack of
resources to invest in the hardware and software needed to develop and share
OER would be an economic barrier. Other
economic barriers are difficulties in covering the costs of developing educational
resources and keeping an OER project running. Technical and economic barriers are often
mentioned as significant obstacles in developing countries. Legal barriers include the prohibition to use
copyrighted materials without the consent of the creator. There seems to be a paradox within the academic
community which strongly emphasises the importance of openly sharing research results
and building on existing scientific data, but at the same time often takes an
unresponsive attitude towards sharing or using educational resources developed
by someone else.
Another
barrier is accreditation – in this
time of ‘value for money’ questions voiced by today’s learners, having some
form of acknowledgement of a standard reached is important. Ways of addressing this include, among
others, for example, Mozilla badges
and the Peer 2 Peer University
.
The increase in non-formal and informal
learning may increase the demand for assessment and recognition of competence
gained outside formal learning.
Pedagogy
Different teaching techniques
are needed to make effective use of open courses. There isn’t at present any way of fixing a
syllabus to suit all participants of an open course, as this defeats the object
of an open course. The role of the teacher
is already changing from being the “sage on the stage to the guide at the
side”. OER is likely to accelerate this
process since the role of the teacher as a supplier of teaching material and
the only guide to knowledge is also diminishing.
[502
words]
References:-
Giving
Knowledge
for Free, Hylen and Schuller
The
Reusability Paradox, David Wiley
OER
Forum Final Report, Albright
Finally finished it!!
I agree that the pedagogy is still developing and think we will be exploring different ways of teaching and learning new skills. The challenges of technology and accessability is still an important challenge.
ReplyDeleteHope you are enjoying H817, I think I am